Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 May 2006 20:44:51 -0300 (ADT)
From:      "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To:        Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: diablo-jdk vs jdk1.5
Message-ID:  <20060527204339.R1114@ganymede.hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060524004530.37df6b39@localhost>
References:  <20060524004530.37df6b39@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Norberto Meijome wrote:

> Hi all,
> 2 questions re. JDK 1.5 :
> - is .15 considered now stable? ( I remember reading that it was still
> considered alpha quality, but i cant see that notice anymore).
>
> - re. diablo-jdk : Other than the obvious advange of precompiled package
> (already done for me, SUN certified) , is there other advantage to using
> diablo-jdk instead of building my own?
> And, in the same vein, any caveats I should keep in mind when using diablo-jdk
> instead of jdk-1.5?

My understanding is that the precompiled package performs better then the 
one you build from ports, *but* ... I don't know why ...

On my 6-STABLE machine, to get Azureus to work properly, I had to add the 
following to /etc/libmap.conf:

[/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/]
libpthread.so                   libc_r.so
libpthread.so.2                 libc_r.so.6

else it just didn't work ...

Beyond that, I've been using the precompiled one and been most happy with 
it ...


----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org                              MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060527204339.R1114>