Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 12:36:05 -0500 From: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> To: Johnson David <DavidJohnson@Siemens.com> Cc: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux vs. Windows Message-ID: <3EF73A85.70007@centtech.com> References: <002201c33812$5b881e80$c601a8c0@starfly> <3EF4567A.23525.2ACFD52E@localhost> <200306231015.44135.DavidJohnson@Siemens.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Johnson David wrote: > On Saturday 21 June 2003 09:58 am, Dan Langille wrote: > > >>It should also be comparing Windows XP, not Windows 2000. I don't >>think we'd like it if they looking at FreeBSD 4.2... > > > Win2K is still very widely used in the market segments where FreeBSD > might be considered. Most of the points against Win2K also apply to > WinXP, so maybe relabeling the column "Windows 2000/XP" is more > appropriate. Actually, more appropriate would be Windows 2000 Advanced Server, right? Windows XP is mainly for desktops, not servers.. Eric
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EF73A85.70007>