Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1998 22:07:16 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> To: Thomas Zenker <thz@lennartz-electronic.de> Cc: small@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Command-line i/f vs WWW i/f Message-ID: <771898F08C1.AAA41E8@smtp04.wxs.nl> In-Reply-To: <19981007092432.A4913@tue.le> References: <Version.32.19981006001935.00e3cd10@pop.wxs.nl> <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9810051410490.4561-100000@korin.warman.org.pl> <000401bdf065$da48a900$0104010a@andrewh.famzon.com.au> <Version.32.19981006001935.00e3cd10@pop.wxs.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 09:24 07-10-98 , Thomas Zenker wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 06, 1998 at 12:23:20AM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
>> True, yet see my other post about the ideas I have a this point about CLI
>> vs WWW. Enough to say that should we have to implement the www pages, we
>> need a very minimal HTTP 1.0 compliant daemon, plus the pages, and that all
>
>We use FBSD in an embedded application with a 40 MB HD, (20MB + 20MB swap),
>for configuring the first time we connect VGA/keyboard. But for some time
>now I am thinking about other solutions as well - WWW would be much more
>feasible for our customers, they aren't unix freaks at all.
Aye, that is something that slipped past my thoughts...
That might also mean that command set would be the biggest userland usable
configuration tool, next to the web interface and any other ingenious
solutions not yet brought forward...
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven / Asmodai <asmodai(at)wxs.nl>
ICQ-UIN: 1564317 .:. Ninth Circle Enterprises
Network/Security Specialist
/==|| FreeBSD and picoBSD, the Power to Serve ||==\
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?771898F08C1.AAA41E8>