Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 06:24:02 +0200 (SAT) From: John Hay <jhay@icomtek.csir.co.za> To: murray@FreeBSD.ORG (Murray Stokely) Cc: qa@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RELENG_4_5 Branch : January 21 ? Message-ID: <200201190424.g0J4O3M97256@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za> In-Reply-To: <20020119015249.GD18200@freebsdmall.com> from Murray Stokely at "Jan 18, 2002 05:52:49 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Why not do it in the RELENG_4 tree? Maybe start with it even before RC1 (in the future). There is nothing that says the documentation shipped with the RCs shouldn't already claim 4.5 or is there? I think you will get more eyes on it in the RELENG_4 branch. > I think that it would be beneficial to create the release branch a > few days earlier than normal, and release the third release candidate > directly from the RELENG_4_5 branch. This would allow us to do a > number of things, such as : > > 1. Update all of the release notes / documentation for the final > release, so that this can be reviewed by our users in RC3 to make > sure nothing is left out. > > 2. Unfreeze RELENG_4, so that regular development can continue. > > The 'RELENG_4_5_0_RELEASE' tag remains, as always, the label for the > final release on the release branch. > > Thoughts? > > - Murray John -- John Hay -- John.Hay@icomtek.csir.co.za / jhay@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200201190424.g0J4O3M97256>