Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 18:44:24 -0600 From: dannyman <dannyman@dannyland.org> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: Brett Taylor <brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu>, Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>, Adam Turoff <aturoff@isinet.com>, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd vs. linux and NT chart Message-ID: <19990302184424.C15210@stumpy.dannyland.org> In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990302161355.00ad66b0@localhost>; from Brett Glass on Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 04:20:49PM -0700 References: <4.1.19990302154522.03fb3730@localhost> <Pine.BSF.4.05.9903021551210.19678-100000@peloton.physics.m ontana.edu> <4.1.19990302161355.00ad66b0@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 04:20:49PM -0700, Brett Glass wrote: > Yes, 2.2.6 is less than a year old, so there SHOULD be a ports tree for it. > There's nothing more frustrating than running /stand/sysinstall to grab a port > and discovering that the ports for your version are gone only a few months > after you installed. And you know why so few people use those "upgrade [...] Ugh, that's when you go to the bloody config screen and change your RELEASE to 2.2.8. Yes, I think this could be more intuitive, but it works well enough right now. ;) -danny -- dannyman - http://www.dannyland.org/~dannyman/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990302184424.C15210>