Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 08:53:58 -0600 From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> To: David Ferry <lamester@netscape.net> Cc: freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Finally a kernel discussion, yay! Message-ID: <37120906.471862CA@softweyr.com> References: <19990411234848.9688.qmail@www0f.netaddress.usa.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Ferry wrote:
>
> >
> > Oh, well... Let's discuss about kernel. 8)
> >
> > Actually I don't know which is the best version to start experiments
> > with...
> >
> > The 3.1 version could be a good candidate, but I have seen a 4.0 version
> > in the -current tree...
> >
>
> I'm not fussed. In fact I don't care. By the time we have this going it won't
> matter.
>
> I haven't had any luck getting a cross compiler on x86 generate sparc-64 code.
> Has anyone done this or are you all using netbsd or something.
> I was using gcc-2.7.2.3 and was getting definition disagrees with previous
> definition for sizet or something (64 bit int I think).
The sparc64 code in any GCC is too broken to bother with. Recent EGCS releases
are somewhat more trustworthy, try one of those. Whatever the NetBSD sparc64
project is currently using is your best bet for compiler bits.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
http://www.softweyr.com/~softweyr wes@softweyr.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37120906.471862CA>