Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 14:24:03 -0600 From: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> To: Stacy Olivas <olivas@digiflux.org> Cc: "'freebsd-advocacy'" <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Indecisiveness and Domain registrations Message-ID: <3E36E6E3.7090406@centtech.com> References: <004601c2c708$11ba6810$0502000a@sentinel>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stacy Olivas wrote: [.. snip older stuff ..] > I propose something along the lines of this (after all, we will be dealing > with the > media, and they like to see people in charge, with titles, etc.. it gives > them a big > warm fuzzy feeling when they can "cut the crap" and go right to the top of > the "food chain").. I agree.. > The FreeBSD Advocacy group should be structured as follows: > > A core team consisting of not less than 4 people, with at least one person > as the overall "head". The core > team will be the ones who set the goals, coordinate press releases, etc.. > (each member will have a vote on > what direction things will go in). The "head" of the team will have an > equal vote on issues, but they will > also be able to take the initiative and have the ability to "push" things in > a given direction (helps > keep from forming a deadlock). > > Using the four person minimum as the base model, each member of the core > team will have specific > responsibilities to towards the adovcacy project. They are divided as > follows (to borrow some stuff from > Anthony's post on lead times, etc): > > > Team head: > Overall project management/Primary POC > Primary advocacy responsibilities: > Onlines/Slashdot > > Core team member #1: > In charge of recruting/providing assistance (direction) to new advocates > Primary advocacy responsibilities: > Magazines > > Core team member #2: > In charge of > Primary advocacy responsibilities: > Newspapers > > Core team member #3: > In charge of > Primary advocacy responsibilities: > Trade rags I like this idea - however I would be more lenient on who does what tasks in the core group - but that can be sorted out. > Each core team member will have the authority to speak on behalf of the > project itself and act as an > official representative for the project (and FreeBSD). They will also have > the authority to > delegate responsibility to people volunteering to work on the advocacy > project (but it does not > alleviate them of being overall responsible for what they have delegated.. > So, if someone drops the ball..) > > New core team members can be added ONLY if there is an unanimous vote from > all current core team members. Yep.. I like it.. Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Systems Administrator Centaur Technology Attitudes are contagious, is yours worth catching? ------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E36E6E3.7090406>