Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 06:40:50 -0700 From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG>, Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: import bawk? Re: NO_AWK Message-ID: <200110261341.f9QDfSS64291@cwsys.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 25 Oct 2001 22:12:15 PDT." <200110260512.f9Q5CFS40443@c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200110260512.f9Q5CFS40443@c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com>, "Bruce A . Mah" writes: > If memory serves me right, Mike Barcroft wrote: > > Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com> writes: > > > >bawk is license friendly for us. > > > > > > "without fee" is license friendly for us? > > > > The way I read it, the "without fee" applies to the "permission", not > > the "any purpose." That is, they grant you permission to use it for > > any purpose and don't charge you a fee. They don't require your uses > > of it be not-for-profit. > > > > It looks like a reworded 3-clause BSD license to me. :) > > Rather than us guessing at the meaning (which I feel *is* rather > ambiguous), would it make sense for someone to request clarification > from some suitable representative of Lucent, telling them exactly what > the plans are and asking if they're compatible with the license? The > Web page has a pointer to Brian Kernighan...I'm pretty sure he'd know > the answer. :-) This is an excellent idea. I recently resolved an MIT Kerberos encryption export issue just by asking. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, ITSD Ministry of Management Services Province of BC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200110261341.f9QDfSS64291>