Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:06:48 -0800
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release
Message-ID:  <474A1C28.8070106@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20071124151306.13d7368a@gumby.homeunix.com.>
References:  <4747A1FB.9000707@FreeBSD.org> <20071124151306.13d7368a@gumby.homeunix.com.>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
RW wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:00:59 -0800
> Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>> How hard would it be to include the c[v]sup checkouts file
>> with the tarball, and install it into some standard location? I think
>> that would greatly increase the utility of the tarball, since you
>> could start from there and immediately update to the latest version
>> without having to pull down the whole tree again.
> 
> c[v]sup doesn't have to pull the whole tree again if it doesn't have a
> checkout file, it's just a kind of metadata cache that speeds things up
> and reduces the server load.

I think you dramatically misunderstand what I'm suggesting, and why it
would be beneficial.

Doug


-- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?474A1C28.8070106>