Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:14:12 +0200 From: Dimitris Tsamis <dtsam@cc.ece.ntua.gr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Passing make options to portmanager Message-ID: <43A47194.8070805@cc.ece.ntua.gr> In-Reply-To: <200512171902.50240.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> References: <000a01c60cb3$8aac6130$2401a8c0@XGISH> <200512161805.25390.ringworm01@gmail.com> <43A450EE.4090005@cc.ece.ntua.gr> <200512171902.50240.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
RW wrote: >On Saturday 17 December 2005 17:54, Dimitris Tsamis wrote: > > > >>I prefer to use pkgtools.conf because from what I understand it is a >>system file, whereas pm-020.conf is only for portmanager >> >> > >This is incorrect. > >pkgtools.conf is the configuration file for portupgrade and the other >package-tools installed by the portupgrade port. Portmanager has recently >aquired the ability to read pkgtools.conf, but it is not a system file, and >it is not read by the ports system if you use the make targets directly. > > > Ok, the name pkgtools is misleading - I thought it refered to pkg_add and family.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43A47194.8070805>