Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:18:28 +0200
From:      Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net>
To:        freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org
Cc:        Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD-10 -> FreeBSD-9.9 ?
Message-ID:  <201110250918.28709.hselasky@c2i.net>
In-Reply-To: <20111024230623.GB14274@dragon.NUXI.org>
References:  <CAJ-Vmom27Z3pkbVyFhsmdt60KDSsxNmT4jLa=dQJrdUGLUNqoA@mail.gmail.com> <20111024230623.GB14274@dragon.NUXI.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 25 October 2011 01:06:23 David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:04:13AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Just an idle comment - why don't we just rename FreeBSD-10 to
> > FreeBSD-9.9 for now, and give the ports/developers some time to "fix"
> > bad autoconf/automake scripts?
> > That way -current can still be used for testing/development.
> 
> I figured someone else would respond by now...
> 
> \aol{me too!}
> 
> (though I suggest 9.99 as a value we'd never hit)
> 
> I've made this change on all my local systems.

Why not use 9.5.x ?

Whould give more number space to increment?

--HPS



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201110250918.28709.hselasky>