Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 21:00:30 +0200 From: Oliver Pinter <oliver.pinter@hardenedbsd.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>, Antoine Brodin <antoine@freebsd.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, re <re@freebsd.org>, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>, svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Subject: Re: svn commit: r331838 - in stable/11: . contrib/compiler-rt/include/sanitizer contrib/compiler-rt/include/xray contrib/compiler-rt/lib/BlocksRuntime contrib/compiler-rt/lib/asan contrib/compiler-rt/l... Message-ID: <CAPQ4ffsmkdDSuozhuXeUV_aAHZDXBTQHBVvh7kZ=_Zu=tyjx8A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2526702.9M648BMneK@ralph.baldwin.cx> References: <201803311138.w2VBcKHP014025@repo.freebsd.org> <20180331184109.GA23589@lonesome.com> <CAPyFy2DL3Acp6DanoZBZm57XWhiujtM0os9Yau6spe%2Bhdzn8Gg@mail.gmail.com> <2526702.9M648BMneK@ralph.baldwin.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/6/18, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Monday, April 02, 2018 12:27:47 PM Ed Maste wrote: >> On 31 March 2018 at 14:41, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote: >> This is the most important point of this discussion: we do need to >> ensure there's good communication and coordination between teams where >> dependencies like this exist. I'll take the blame here: Dimitry asked >> me about merging the Clang update to stable/11 and I agreed that it >> was reasonable to merge sooner rather than later to have as much lead >> time as possible before the 11.2 process starts. I also assumed that >> outstanding Clang 6 issues in ports were farther along in being >> addressed. >> >> The key lesson from this discussion is that for significant commits >> and merges like this one we should make sure to always have sufficient >> advance notice. > > Is this driven by -mretpoline? Don't think so since it requires LLD as linker. The LLVM 5 which was already part of the 11-stable has the retpoline option. See r331219. >From other side, I like to see a newer compiler sets in the recent releases, because there are lot of performance improvements and other fixes. > That is, would we not be as aggressive > with pushing for clang 6 in 11.2 if it weren't for that? I kind of feel > like we probably wouldn't and would have left it at 5 and let clang 6 be > a FreeBSD 12 thing. Was -mretpoline backported to clang 5 (I thought > there was some talk of providing patches for clang 5)? > > -- > John Baldwin > _______________________________________________ > svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-stable-11 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "svn-src-stable-11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPQ4ffsmkdDSuozhuXeUV_aAHZDXBTQHBVvh7kZ=_Zu=tyjx8A>