Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:31:25 -0400
From:      Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org>
To:        Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: "cpuset -n prefer:?" --what values for "?" are supposed to be allowed? (only 1 is, despite two numa domains)
Message-ID:  <20190911143125.GA17992@raichu>
In-Reply-To: <C230AB3E-2FCF-4837-A4FD-A29F037647FC@yahoo.com>
References:  <C230AB3E-2FCF-4837-A4FD-A29F037647FC@yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:58:05PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
> In a context with:
> 
> # cpuset -g
> pid -1 mask: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27
> pid -1 domain policy: first-touch mask: 0, 1
> 
> I get:
> 
> # cpuset -l0 -n prefer:0 COMMAND
> cpuset: setdomain: Invalid argument
> 
> # cpuset -l0 -n prefer:2 COMMAND
> cpuset: setdomain: Invalid argument
> 
> But one prefer:? value does allow the COMMAND
> to run:
> 
> # cpuset -l0 -n prefer:1 COMMAND
> 
> This seem odd to me. Am I missing something?
> 
> For reference: I'm using a ThreadRipper 1950X
> with a head -r351227 based context for this
> activity. The above happens to have been run
> in a Windows 10 Pro HyperV session, instead
> of in a native-boot of the same media. (A
> native-boot would have had 32 CPUs.)

Can you please show the output of "sysctl vm.phys_segs" from this
setup?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190911143125.GA17992>