Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 12:56:16 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: tcl -- what's going on here. Message-ID: <199606191856.MAA06876@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <199606191840.LAA13530@phaeton.artisoft.com> References: <199606191521.KAA24028@sparcmill.grauel.com> <199606191840.LAA13530@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ Allow me to wax for a quick moment. This is the *only* post I'll make on this topic ] > Many of us have a long history, either as employees or as tier-one > developers for major UNIX systems houses. The reason we are here > is to Do The Right Thing The Right Way. Actually, the reason I'm here is because this is 'fun'. And, there is prestige to be had for being a contributor. The latter is the reason we do things the 'right way', because if you do crappy work the prestige is lessened. However, sometimes 'the right way' gets in the way of 'fun', due to time constraints and other issues, so the developers settle for 'the best job given the current situation'. If that means using TCL and having a workable solution next week vs. spending 2 years writing a end-all/be-all/do-all front-end that is the 100% correct solution then I'm for using TCL. That doesn't mean 'crap' is allowed, but there are certain tradeoffs that are acceptable, such as allowing GPL'd code into the tree when there is nothing BSDish that fits the bill. But, it also means that we didn't accept the SVR3 style shlib either because in the long-run it'd make like *more* difficult for both the developers *and* users. Claiming that we only do the '100%' pure thing is simply leading people astray. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606191856.MAA06876>