Date: Wed, 06 Nov 1996 22:14:38 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> To: Mark Mayo <mark@quickweb.com> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: please test -currents kernel Message-ID: <5489.847314878@critter.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 06 Nov 1996 17:20:11 EST." <Pine.BSF.3.94.961106171443.1049B-100000@vinyl.quickweb.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.3.94.961106171443.1049B-100000@vinyl.quickweb.com>, Mark M > >Huh? I thought if I wanted to help in the preparation for the 2.2 release, >that the RELENG_2_2 branch was exactly what I needed... On that note, I >CVSupped the RELENG_2_2 branch last night, and it seems quite solid so >far. My only problem had to do with xdm not starting up by default because >it wanted libgnumalloc.so.2.0, which I just ln -s'ed to >libfakegnumallow.so.2.0 and everything seems great so far! > >Are the changes you are talking about eventually going to make into the >RELENG_2_2 branch? I'm especially interested in the SCSI code, and the >ncrcontrol stuff seeing I have a 53c810 NCR controller.. We are considering the changes that went into -current after the RELENG_2_2 branch was made, and thus want input on -current, to decide if it is fit. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5489.847314878>