Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:02:27 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 10.0-RC1: bad mbuf leak? Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=D%2BTq4SNJsEK5a4Aw9as34m31hutU%2BwQ1GqqaD2a3zVg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <FB1A916C-7ABA-4FFD-A79A-CF757E83F6E8@lurchi.franken.de> References: <1387204500.12061.60192349.19EAE1B4@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAJ-VmonGE2=vmFOnCtLVLyNp0=F%2BNUd6OdU6=rROH_PWkyXSDA@mail.gmail.com> <FB1A916C-7ABA-4FFD-A79A-CF757E83F6E8@lurchi.franken.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19 December 2013 01:09, Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> wrote: > On Dec 19, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> Hm, try reverting just the em code to that from a 10.0-BETA? Just in >> case something changed there? > I saw a similar behaviour without the patches we are discussing (regarding > ignoring the error). Hm. Why was that? -a
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=D%2BTq4SNJsEK5a4Aw9as34m31hutU%2BwQ1GqqaD2a3zVg>