Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      12 Aug 2003 18:49:55 -0400
From:      Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-chat-local@be-well.no-ip.com>
To:        Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
Cc:        Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:09.signal
Message-ID:  <44lltyij8s.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
In-Reply-To: <3F37D493.9050604@potentialtech.com>
References:  <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030811133518.66226B-100000@fledge.watson.org> <3F37D493.9050604@potentialtech.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> writes:

> Robert Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Bill Moran wrote:
> >
> >> You encorage me, Rob. Your story tells me that the "law of
> >> percentages" is in my favor.  It's
> >> the same theory that has sold so many car "club"s. If I set up the
> >> wireless networks I install with any measure of security
> >> whatsoever, it's unlikely that they'll get attacked/cracked simply
> >> because there are so many other easy targets.
> > Fear the world in which WEP is considered a effective deterrant :-).
> 
> Fear then.  For that is currently the world we live in!

WEP is sufficiently insecure that if and when I get around to using
wireless at home, I'll need to firewall the wireless net heavily in
any case.  I may just leave it without WEP for the convenience of
occasional visitors (as long as I don't notice strangers hopping onto
it much).



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44lltyij8s.fsf>