Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 23 Jun 2001 17:19:22 -0400
From:      Allen <allen@easytospell.com>
To:        "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com>, "Bill Moran" <wmoran@iowna.com>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   RE: [OT] Spam from Windriver - how should I react?
Message-ID:  <3.0.5.32.20010623171922.00db1f18@pop.easytospell.com>
In-Reply-To: <000001c0fc20$7ad7f420$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com>
References:  <3B337E1B.65DBBAAA@iowna.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
At 01:09 PM 6/23/2001 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:

>All that is required to classify an e-mail transmission as spam 

The only reason I'm commenting here is because care should be taken 
when defining spam so that no loop holes are left open and you don't 
inadvertently leave yourself standing on a slippery slope. 

The best definition I've seen is:

http://www.monkeys.com/spam-defined/


-- 
Allen C
mindsieve.com
easytospell.com
packetmonkeys.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.5.32.20010623171922.00db1f18>