Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 13:41:27 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> To: "Chris H" <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> Cc: <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: make clean differs between machines/jails Message-ID: <20150604134127.279f19ab@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <9844a2486fe3e7d75a8f56510916aded@ultimatedns.net> References: <20150604103925.72aaff66@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> <9844a2486fe3e7d75a8f56510916aded@ultimatedns.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 21:12:41 -0700 "Chris H" <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> wrote: > On Thu, 4 Jun 2015 10:39:25 +0800 Erich Dollansky > <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> wrote > > > I just wondered by the same makefile leads to different results. > > Here is the output of a 'make clean' from two machines/jails using > > the same ports tree: > > > > > > Does anybody know why it is like this? > I don't know I can say for sure. But is it possible that the > list outside the jail had not been built/installed before. > Whereas those listed outside the jail, had already been > built/installed before inside the jail? > > Meaning; if the port had already been built/installed before, > it wouldn't show up in the "cleaning" list. > makes sense. I assume now that a port shows up when its 'work' directory exists. Do you know more about it? Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150604134127.279f19ab>