Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 20:25:47 +0400 From: Dmitry Sivachenko <mitya@cavia.pp.ru> To: Gary Jennejohn <garyj@jennejohn.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: struct ipc_perm Message-ID: <20030618162547.GA91861@fling-wing.demos.su> In-Reply-To: <200306181608.h5IG8bvI011153@peedub.jennejohn.org> References: <20030618155016.GA88834@fling-wing.demos.su> <200306181608.h5IG8bvI011153@peedub.jennejohn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 06:08:37PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > Dmitry Sivachenko writes: > > Hello! > > > > Is there any reason why struct ipc_perm is not protected by #ifdef _KERNEL > > in ipc.h? Is it supposed to be used from userland? > > > > It's needed by ipcs. > Ah, I see. It is visible via struct msqid_ds. I developed a patch which requires addition of custom field to ipc_perm. I am trying to imagine which problems can it cause to userland programs. Any ideas? Thanks!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030618162547.GA91861>