Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 09:50:41 -0700 From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@atg.aciworldwide.com> To: Giorgos Keramidas <charon@labs.gr> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GNU Compiler Symlinks Message-ID: <200110301650.f9UGof0H009849@atg.aciworldwide.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Giorgos Keramidas <charon@labs.gr> of "Tue, 30 Oct 2001 01:21:43 %2B0200." <20011030012143.B32738@hades.hell.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Well, Lyndon, this is quickly turning into a flamefest. 64 bit time_t is a flamefest. This, OTOH, is a very reasonable discussion. > It really is not worth it, is it? Without discussion there would never be change. I was curious to discover the rational for keeping the GNU names for the C compiler (but not the other GNU tools). I'm not sure I really received an answer, and maybe that's the answer in itself. But you're right - this horse is dead. --lyndon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200110301650.f9UGof0H009849>