Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:22:17 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> To: Sandra Kachelmann <s.kachelmann@googlemail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version Message-ID: <49DDE879.3080600@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <91b92520904080938g20b6351er4ce13a5a601c2aea@mail.gmail.com> References: <91b92520904080938g20b6351er4ce13a5a601c2aea@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
OK. I've just committed a patch. Sandra Kachelmann wrote: > Hi > > I _really_ still miss this functionality :-( Could you please re-implement it? > > Sandra > > > > > > Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> > Date > 3 Jul 2008 09:50:58 > Subject > Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version > Message-ID > 486CA0AF.3020602@FreeBSD.org > > In reply to > Sandra Kachelmann > References to > Sandra Kachelmann > Replies > Robert Huff > Referenced by > Robert Huff, Sergey Matveychuk > > > Sandra Kachelmann wrote: >> After upgrading from portupgrade to portupgrade-devel the command >> >> $ portversion -vl'<' >> >> does not show the _current_ version anymore. Why was it removed? I >> found the information useful. >> >> before: >> gnutls-2.4.0 < needs updating (port has 2.4.1) >> >> now: >> gnutls < needs updating (port has 2.4.1) > > Looks like it's a side effect of new options implementation. Now you can > use -Fvl options. But I'll think to back this functionality. > > Thanks. > -- > Dixi. > Sem. -- Dixi. Sem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49DDE879.3080600>