Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 1 Jun 2001 16:42:22 +0200
From:      Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>
To:        "Karsten W. Rohrbach" <karsten@rohrbach.de>
Cc:        chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: interesting os comparison charts
Message-ID:  <20010601164222.A4578@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d>
In-Reply-To: <20010601154523.A10477@mail.webmonster.de>; from karsten@rohrbach.de on Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 03:45:23PM %2B0200
References:  <20010529214403.L85298@mail.webmonster.de> <20010530205056.G29853@mail.webmonster.de> <20010530210351.C65759@rapier.smartspace.co.za> <20010531233829.A58131@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d> <20010601154523.A10477@mail.webmonster.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Also sprach Karsten W. Rohrbach (karsten@rohrbach.de):

> > Thus spake Neil Blakey-Milner (nbm@mithrandr.moria.org):
> > > I'm reasonably famous for being the cause for better network performance
> > > at my university society. ;)
> > btw, what is a recommended value for a webserver with average load?
> value for what?
> MAXUSERS?
> NMBCLUSTERS?

Heh, we were speaking about NMBCLUSTERS :-)

> no, seriously, what machine in terms of cpu/ram and network
> connectivity, what server software (apache/...), applications
> (php/mod_python), database, how many object requests per sec? session
> support? etc...

Well, I'm more interested in some charts, that shows the performance
of various NMBCLUSTERS values up to - uhm BIG values (> 2^20).
Knowing these it could be easier to decide what's better for a certain
usage.

I thought maybe someone has already done
some, since I could imagine, that a too high value could decrease
speed again (due to memory utilization overhead).

I'm currently using 2^14, which seems to be a good choice, when I take
a look at your value.

Alex

--J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iQEVAwUBOxepzbRIIUSeqRcRAQGF4ggAg1hEbBNGpHoxQLGZtzuKqcNrAXWyRSTl
fK+Z64pkP7dUzVOnuL5hX4yvW/FMuWIrUclUxuuqj3g1UKQ+iPcq+f+TkqdW2990
fZf5W8U92rVHHtAouAWKg3vpPhSadwzhemY1lehuQMVU0rZarQVW2zK2phXQadwH
+lumrHruETBmJ4AFxKuIh6rC5lzpNg0D1c4orxeiMJFjECkBTrgBjZqGX6tpuLYP
kqZ4JPpyztPCv4UeYyTMDXAplhcYkzrVTFfNV0g03oCH1CJVgxuA0y3lSTG2w2Ee
6Ol+Pd+Co81F+ZsD3ffwfgM+mfAsl+DQ2/QOYyZFQpUiTW5od21a/g==
=TYXh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010601164222.A4578>