Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Dec 2001 20:06:59 -0600
From:      Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com>
To:        "Gary W. Swearingen" <swear@blarg.net>
Cc:        Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: IBM's intentions with JFS (was: IBM suing (was: RMS Suing was [SUGGESTION] - JFS for FreeBSD))
Message-ID:  <20011217200659.L377@prism.flugsvamp.com>
In-Reply-To: <qpheqp1eza.eqp@localhost.localdomain>
References:  <local.mail.freebsd-chat/4.3.2.7.2.20011215232233.00e74cc0@localhost> <local.mail.freebsd-chat/4.3.2.7.2.20011216221810.031b6820@localhost> <local.mail.freebsd-chat/4.3.2.7.2.20011217001345.00e26280@localhost> <local.mail.freebsd-chat/20011217185738.N14500@monorchid.lemis.com> <200112171739.fBHHdJj86694@prism.flugsvamp.com> <293d2935g7.d29@localhost.localdomain> <20011217160411.G377@prism.flugsvamp.com> <5dpu5d1j1y.u5d@localhost.localdomain> <20011217183103.K377@prism.flugsvamp.com> <qpheqp1eza.eqp@localhost.localdomain>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 05:42:01PM -0800, Gary W. Swearingen wrote:
>
> Yes, of course the GPL may contain unenforcable restrictions.  But the
> prudent person will assume that it doesn't until a court finds that does.

A prudent person will make a rational decision rather than taking 
everything at face value.


> P.S. Please educate yourself as to Mr. Stallman's trustworthiness in
> regards to the applicability of the GPL to which you referred above.

And you might want to educate yourself as to what the GPL says; see
Gary Clark's posting, which indicates this whole discussion is moot.
-- 
Jonathan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011217200659.L377>