Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 02:04:21 -0600 From: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> To: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Renaming standard-supfile? Message-ID: <15016.36485.390431.9980@guru.mired.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I suspect this has been gone over before, but can't find anything in the lists that seem relevant. People using "standard-supfile" because it's the "standard" and getting -current seem to show up on a regular basis. I can see why it might have had that name before, but the name seems problematic now. Is there any point in petitioning to get it changed to something that doesn't induce errors? Given that we've got stable-supfile, "current-supfile" seems like an obvious choice. It would certainly solve the problem. Thanx, <mike -- Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15016.36485.390431.9980>