Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 8 Apr 1998 10:19:09 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@plutotech.com>
To:        mike@smith.net.au (Mike Smith)
Cc:        dkelly@hiwaay.net, wilko@yedi.iaf.nl, FreeBSD-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Summary: shopping for new video adapter
Message-ID:  <199804081619.KAA02357@panzer.plutotech.com>
In-Reply-To: <199804071657.JAA00365@dingo.cdrom.com> from Mike Smith at "Apr 7, 98 09:57:00 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Smith wrote...
> > Wilko Bulte writes:
> > Interesting summary, as I may shortly be in the market to replace 
> > my 2MB Mach32 card. Was surprised nobody quoted 
> > /usr/ports/benchmarks/xengine results. It may not be much of a 
> > benchmark but its something more than seat of the pants.
> 
> OK, people asked for it.  8)
> 
> > I get between 750 and 1000 (peak) RPM, usually in the 800's with a 2MB 
> > PCI Mach32, 1024x768 16bpp with exmh also open. 64MB PPro-200/512k.
> > 
> > About 1100 RPM on an 800x600 16bpp P-133 Mach64 machine at work.
> 
> Under 3.0 as of early March, 337MHz PII on a 75MHz bus, talking to a 
> 4M Matrox Millenium II.
> 
> XFree86 3.3.2,  1024x768x32bpp -  790rpm (constant)
> XFree86 3.3.2, 1280x1024x24bpp -  845rpm (constant, screen corrupt)
> XFree86 3.3.2, 1600x1200x16bpp - 1200rpm (constant)
> XFree86 3.3.2, 1600x1200x 8bpp - 2780rpm (constant)
> 
> Xaccel 4.01, 1280x1024x24bpp -  970rpm (constant)
> Xaccel 4.01, 1600x1200x16bpp - 1480rpm (constant)
> Xaccel 4.01, 1600x1200x 8bpp - 6105rpm (constant, screen corrupt)
> 
> Performance isn't (to me) so much an issue as the server working.  
> Right now, neither work properly.  The Xig server works better for me 
> than the XFree server, in that it's hard to use the system when there's 
> noise all over your windows.  YMMV.


current, late March, 233MHz Pentium Pro, 8M Millennium II

Xaccel 4.1, 1280x1024x32bpp - sometimes ~1900rpm, sometimes ~2030rpm

	I've got a number of patches to Accelerated X 4.1 applied.  If
indeed you only have 4.01, you might want to upgrade to 4.1 and get the
patches.  The description for patch 22 says that it increases performance
for the Millennium II.

	I'm not sure about the color depth, it's either 24 or 32bpp.  In
the Accelerated X setup thing, I've got the colors set to "16M, Overlays"
as opposed to "16M, Packed".  So I assume that's probably 32bpp.


Ken
-- 
Kenneth Merry
ken@plutotech.com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804081619.KAA02357>