Date: Sun, 1 Dec 1996 16:59:41 +0100 (MET) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Cc: cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sbin@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org, sos@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern subr_diskslice.c src/sbin/i386/fdisk fdisk.c src/sys/ufs/ufs ufs_disksubr.c src/sys/scsi od.c sd.c Message-ID: <199612011559.QAA14281@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199612011329.AAA20664@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from Bruce Evans at "Dec 2, 96 00:29:20 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Bruce Evans wrote: > Urk. This version does the scaling in the wrong place. The scaling > belongs in subr_diskslice.c, not in dozens of drivers. I was planning to > use the version by akiyama@kme.mei.co.jp (Shunsuke Akiyama) in the kernel. Aren't you also on the scsi list? The above has been mildly discussed there, and i cannot remember any arguments from you pro or con either approach. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612011559.QAA14281>