Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 10:40:32 +0200 (CEST) From: sthaug@nethelp.no To: stdin@niklaas.eu Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, tinc@tinc-vpn.org Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD,Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD Message-ID: <20160527.104032.41706561.sthaug@nethelp.no> In-Reply-To: <20160527081112.GA9827@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> References: <016845dd-2c42-5aeb-f65d-02a6fb77acec@seacom.mu> <20160527.085355.74680254.sthaug@nethelp.no> <20160527081112.GA9827@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I don't see any problem using ULA with for instance /124 netmask: > [...] > > 96 bit works too: > [...] > > FreeBSD version? Mine is 10.3-RELEASE-p3. lab1 is 10.3-PRERELEASE r297313M lab2 is 10.2-STABLE r288601M Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160527.104032.41706561.sthaug>