Date: 29 Jan 2003 14:45:06 -0800 From: swear@attbi.com (Gary W. Swearingen) To: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [bsd-advocacy] Re: Draft: Proposed FreeBSD PubRel project Charter Message-ID: <7r4r7rinil.r7r@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <3E382989.1040205@centtech.com> References: <002801c2c7c7$968abfd0$0502000a@sentinel> <3E382558.8000508@centtech.com> <1043867511.677.3.camel@sharpie> <1043867599.677.6.camel@sharpie> <3E382989.1040205@centtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I just joined this list. The five messages of this thread which I just downloaded used 1284 lines for 22 lines of original text. Am I wrong to note that? Is there no need to worry about anybody's costs of transmission and storage? Or readers need to scroll messages to search for embedded comments which aren't there? Also, http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/eresources.html#ERESOURCES-MAILa says only that the list is "FreeBSD Evangelism". It has no charter. If a regular will write one up, I'll wait for others to improve on it for a couple of days and then I'll paste it into a PR, etc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7r4r7rinil.r7r>