Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 17:29:12 +0100 From: Peter McGarvey <fbsd-x@packet.org.uk> To: Paul Robinson <paul@iconoplex.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Drawing graphics on terminal Message-ID: <20030619162912.GA39352@packet.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20030619145956.GL20204@iconoplex.co.uk> References: <200306162015.06836.nakal@web.de> <20030616151024.0616e1e4.eaja@erols.com> <20030616191852.GA52694@ussenterprise.ufp.org> <20030618100125.GP20204@iconoplex.co.uk> <1055948691.92188.10.camel@beastie.freebsd.local> <20030619133406.GI20204@iconoplex.co.uk> <20030619145007.GA36722@packet.org.uk> <20030619145956.GL20204@iconoplex.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Paul Robinson <paul@iconoplex.co.uk> [2003-06-19 16:01:12 BST]: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 03:50:07PM +0100, Peter McGarvey wrote: > > > I'm with you on this. > > You'll regret it... :-) > I'd likely regret not jumping on board more ;-) > > Although "freebsd-user-friendly@freebsd.org" implies FreeBSD is > > currently unfriendly, which IMHO is decidedly not the case. So as we're > > talking about making it easier to run FreeBSD on the desktop, I think > > "freebsd-desktop@freebsd.org" would be a better idea. > > OK, that seems fine. The issue is as to whether this effort will produce > anything with so much "we don't want to take the desktop market" sentiment > around, in which case it might be time to consider... dare I say it... a > code fork.... Oh dear, a fork would be a v. bad thing. So perhaps any Desktop FreeBSD projects should work from the perspective that a fork is, without exception, not an option. > > Let's see how -desktop works out. :-) > > -- > Paul Robinson -- TTFN, FNORD Peter McGarvey Freelance FreeBSD Hacker (will work for bandwidth)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030619162912.GA39352>