Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:48:30 -0700 From: David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_Strange_bea=e2=94=82hio_in_daily_messsges?= Message-ID: <22b5ddff-b6df-3cac-0053-05abe3bf4c97@holgerdanske.com> In-Reply-To: <20200430202808.GA39309@mithril.foucry.net> References: <20200430044801.GA22722@mithril.foucry.net> <2a178278-fd90-189e-edcd-dbe224ea94d5@holgerdanske.com> <20200430202808.GA39309@mithril.foucry.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2020-04-30 13:28, Jacques Foucry wrote: > Le jeudi 30 avr. 2020 à 12:22:03 (-0700), David Christensen à écrit: >> On 2020-04-29 21:48, Jacques Foucry wrote: >>> Hello All, >>> >>> Hop your going. >>> >>> I run a FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE-p4 on a baremetal server with many jail (one per >>> fonction). >>> >>> The mail jail use rspamd to fight against spam. >>> Like all of us I receveive everゆ mornin a security report from my jail (and >>> the host). >>> >>> In everey reports I found many rspamd errors: >>> >>> `(rspamd-2.5), jid 19, uid 236: exited on signal 10` >>> >>> Ok thats means rspand got a problem, but why I found tほose reports in *every* >>> daily security mail of *every* jail I use? >>> >>> How can I stop it? I did find (may be I look bad) anything in periodic >>> security script? >>> >>> What I miss? >>> >>> Thanks for you help and advices, >>> Take care. >> >> It appears signal 10 is a bus error: >> >> https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/blob/master/sys/sys/signal.h > > Sad news :-( > >> This page clarifies the meaning of "bus error": >> >> https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/segmentation-fault-sigsegv-vs-bus-error-sigbus/ > > Thnaks for the pointer >> >> My guess would be the latter case -- unaligned memory access. This >> could be a coding bug (struct not laid out for 64-bit architecture?) or >> a misconfigured compile (?). >> >> >> Where did your rspamd binary come from -- package? port? downloaded >> and built by hand? > > Compile from my poudriere, no special configuration. I mean no `poudriere > options mail/rspamd`. > > > So should be ok with the hardware (poudriere and mail jail are running on the > same bare-metal server). > > Thanks for your help. Please "reply to list" rather than "reply to sender". I would file a bug report for rspamd. David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?22b5ddff-b6df-3cac-0053-05abe3bf4c97>