Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:50:55 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn <garyj@jennejohn.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: the future of xemacs21 Message-ID: <200304220850.h3M8ouGr003174@peedub.jennejohn.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Porters, xemacs-devel was just repo copied to xemacs to track the stable branch of Xemacs. The question now is, what do we do with xemacs21? xemacs-21.1.14, which is what's in xemacs21, is now considered historical. But there are so many other ports which depend on xemacs21 that it may well be a good idea to keep xemacs21 around and create new ports to track xemacs. So I'd like to get a consensus. Do we delete xemacs21 after all the ports which depend on it are updated to depend on xemacs? Or do we want to keep xemacs21 and add new ports to depend on the new xemacs? Another thing. Who is allowd to modify Mk/bsd.emacs.mk to reflect the creation od editors/xemacs? -------- Gary Jennejohn / garyj@jennejohn.org gj@freebsd.org gj@denx.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200304220850.h3M8ouGr003174>