Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 13:25:01 -0700 From: Johnson David <djohnson@acuson.com> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, James Michael DuPont <mdupont777@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Stallman stalls again Message-ID: <200206271325.01974.djohnson@acuson.com> In-Reply-To: <3D1B6DBA.B00F3406@mindspring.com> References: <20020627104644.22223.qmail@web13305.mail.yahoo.com> <3D1B6DBA.B00F3406@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 27 June 2002 12:55 pm, Terry Lambert wrote: > Frankly, the posting of a private communication like this is bad > "nettiquite", and I rather expect that RMS wished that it had > not been published, since it demonstrates a distinction between > private and publically held positions with regard to liberty vs. > freedom. This private communication is the heart of the whole matter. It may be against netiquette, but it seems to me to be quite necessary given the situation. The public writings of RMS are quite clear that information should never be suppressed. Yet here is a letter from RMS urging information suppression. David To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200206271325.01974.djohnson>