Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Sep 2010 01:40:13 +0200
From:      Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, Luigi Rizzo <luigi@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r213253 - head/sys/netinet/ipfw
Message-ID:  <20100928234013.GA21162@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
In-Reply-To: <4CA2776B.5080905@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201009282246.o8SMkDpg088199@svn.freebsd.org> <4CA2776B.5080905@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 04:16:59PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 9/28/2010 3:46 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >Author: luigi
> >Date: Tue Sep 28 22:46:13 2010
> >New Revision: 213253
> >URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/213253
> >
> >Log:
> >   Whitespace changes to reduce diffs wrt the most recent ipfw/dummynet 
> >   code:
> >   + remove an unused macro,
> >   + adjust the constants in an enum
> >   + small whitespace changes
> 
> It's generally a bad idea to mix pure ws changes with functional ones.

does unused code count as 'functional' change ?
All the changes in this commit are a no-op in FreeBSD-world.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100928234013.GA21162>