Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 14:26:13 -0400 From: The Anarcat <anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx> To: Paul Robinson <paul@iconoplex.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: YAPIB (was: Drawing graphics on terminal) Message-ID: <20030619182612.GB1074@xtanbul> In-Reply-To: <20030619095739.GC20204@iconoplex.co.uk> References: <200306162015.06836.nakal@web.de> <20030616151024.0616e1e4.eaja@erols.com> <20030616191852.GA52694@ussenterprise.ufp.org> <20030618100125.GP20204@iconoplex.co.uk> <1055948691.92188.10.camel@beastie.freebsd.local> <20030618154012.GE533@xtanbul> <20030619095739.GC20204@iconoplex.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On jeu jun 19, 2003 at 10:57:39 +0100, Paul Robinson wrote: > > libh's dead, folks. It's been dead for a good while now. I was just > > kicking it to make it look like we could tear something out of this > > monster. > > It's not *that* bad is it? :-) It's right now to the point I wouldn't consider writing more code for libh, but I'd reuse the ideas in a smaller, plugin-based, swig-foobar rewrite. So yes, libh is kinda bad, for me at least. And it involves a lot of C++ magic I don't really like. But, as always, if someone feels like picking the horse (wether it's alive or dead I'm never too sure), feel free! The code is there for anyone who dares to look. I've also put up a doxygen framework and there's a bit of design doc, so no, libh's still no so bad since so much people put so much time in it during its long existence. I apologize again for being so brutal to this project which had so high hopes and also to all the people who worked on it. Cheers, A.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030619182612.GB1074>