Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 Aug 2003 10:31:45 +0100
From:      Paul Robinson <paul@iconoplex.co.uk>
To:        Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
Cc:        chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:09.signal
Message-ID:  <3F3A0581.9010908@iconoplex.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <3F397708.7050803@potentialtech.com>
References:  <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030811133518.66226B-100000@fledge.watson.org> <3F37D493.9050604@potentialtech.com> <44lltyij8s.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <3F397708.7050803@potentialtech.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bill Moran wrote:

> And ... as far as I'm concerned, WEP is _completly_ insecure, and totally
> worthless.

Great, so I send you 10Mb of WEP traffic caught off the air, you can 
decrypt it for me? You see, to me it's just a big mess of encrypted 
traffic, but you obviously have some secret technique (or should that be 
"t3kni|<" ?) for breaking it trivially. If you can't, you've just shown 
it has some security advantage. Which it has.

Oh, and I think you meant that you were guessing WEP is completely 
UNsecure, and not INsecure. If it was insecure, it would be asking us 
all to hug it more often.

-- 
Paul Robinson




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F3A0581.9010908>