Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Feb 2003 03:06:48 +0100
From:      Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org>
To:        Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        sparc64@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Too early for posting 5.0-RELEASE uptime records?
Message-ID:  <20030218020648.GG60813@elvis.mu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030217205235.J74149@espresso.bsdmike.org>
References:  <20030217205235.J74149@espresso.bsdmike.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Barcroft wrote:
> 
>  8:58PM  up 25 days,  2:16, 1 user, load averages: 1.01, 1.04, 1.02
> 
> This is the sparc64 tinderbox which has a constant load.  Looks like
> sparc64 will have no problem matching (beating?) i386 for production
> quality.

I already did 42 days uptime on my sparc64 box :-).  This box was
probably much less busy than the tinderbox one though.

Cheers,
Maxime

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030218020648.GG60813>