Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:28:37 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Time to stop buildling named (and friends) by default in 6-current? Message-ID: <423F82D5.8000309@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200503210815.35493.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <4239D7AD.7050004@freebsd.org> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1050318120716.87456F-100000@fledge.watson.org> <20050319225507.GH60989@fasolt.home.paeps.cx> <200503210815.35493.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin wrote:
> I agree in that I think BIND is good to have in the tree. I think it should
> just default to install everything. Folks who don't want certain things can
> always prune them out later. Having the server installed can be useful for
> being able to run a local caching nameserver at conferences when the hotel
> DNS is horrible (Boston ATC last year) even if you don't run it all the
> time. :) Also, the release process will be a lot simpler if it just installs
> everything by default.
As far as I can see, this comment from John (and the similar one from
Robert) represent the consensus viewpoint. I will therefore drop this as an
action item unless someone makes a very convincing case to change the
current defaults.
Thanks to everyone who offered their opinions and support on this topic.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?423F82D5.8000309>