Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 09:49:00 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>, "Valeriy E. Ushakov" <uwe@ptc.spbu.ru>, <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Should IPFilter be pulled from FreeBSD as well Message-ID: <04a401c0e917$a968a120$931576d8@inethouston.net> References: <005e01c0e913$0803a180$3028680a@tgt.com> <20010530183940.A3569@snark.ptc.spbu.ru> <00c301c0e917$003b74b0$3028680a@tgt.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Someone on irc mentioned that something like ipf that cannot be modified should go into the ports. Not my personal belief, but I thought I would relay it anyhow. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net> To: "Valeriy E. Ushakov" <uwe@ptc.spbu.ru>; <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 9:44 AM Subject: Re: Should IPFilter be pulled from FreeBSD as well > Nothing in that article has convinced me that FreeBSD developers can change > the source at their will and distribute it -- according to the IPFilter > licence. That right should be implicit in ALL FreeBSD system level source > code. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?04a401c0e917$a968a120$931576d8>