Date: Wed, 8 Nov 1995 11:09:56 -0600 (CST) From: "Karl Denninger, MCSNet" <karl@mcs.com> To: davidg@Root.COM Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Impact of upcoming 2.1 release on the STABLE branch? Message-ID: <m0tDE0a-000IDUC@venus.mcs.com> In-Reply-To: <199511081656.IAA00153@corbin.Root.COM> from "David Greenman" at Nov 8, 95 08:55:09 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >Anyone know what it is? What will STABLE be after this release goes? > > For awhile (months), it will continue to be the 2.1 sources. We are > planning a 2.1.5 (perhaps 2.1.1 - we haven't decided yet what to call it) > release sometime during the first quarter of '96. > > -DG Wait a second... I thought that STABLE was something *less than* 2.1? So once 2.1 "ships", then STABLE will be 2.1 as-is, plus perhaps patches? I'm trying to figure out which copy to SUP here and maintain locally. I haven't used CURRENT, as that is by definition at times not even compilable. For a production system, STABLE has been ok for us -- is this the continuing recommendation? -- -- Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.Net)| MCSNet - The Finest Internet Connectivity Modem: [+1 312 248-0900] | (shell, PPP, SLIP, leased) in Chicagoland Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1] | 7 Chicagoland POPs, ISDN, 28.8, much more Fax: [+1 312 248-9865] | Email to "info@mcs.net" WWW: http://www.mcs.net ISDN - Get it here TODAY! | Home of Chicago's *Three STAR A* Clarinet feed!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m0tDE0a-000IDUC>