Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:41:23 -0400 From: Mag Gam <magawake@gmail.com> To: Matthieu Hueck <matthieu@mhueck.demon.nl> Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD or Intel Message-ID: <1cbd6f830507270341d715204@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20050724142312.027D543D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org> References: <1cbd6f8305072406446c872066@mail.gmail.com> <20050724142312.027D543D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks for the reply! Seems like I may go to Turion! On 7/24/05, Matthieu Hueck <matthieu@mhueck.demon.nl> wrote: > > It seems I would like to goto the AMD route because of the 64bit > > compatabality (yea..I am a victim of Marketing). > > > > What is the major difference between AMD64, Turion, and Sempron? > > > AMD64 is their main chip, it's geared towards maximum performance. Turion= is > their low-power notebook chip like Intels Pentium M and Sempron is their > budget version of the AMD64, comparable to Intels Celeron processor. >=20 > > > > On 7/13/05, Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de> wrote: > > > Astrodog wrote: > > > > > > >>I purchased an e-machines AMD laptop in April and had nothing but > > > >>problems with cooling. The machine constantly over heated. So, if > > you > > > >>go the AMD route. Make sure you do some research and specifically > > > >>cooling issues. > > > >> > > > >>Ray > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >As a quick note, AMD Mobiles (Athlon64 Mobile, etc), tend to consume > > > >less power than comparable Intels (Non-Mobile P4s, Mobile EEs, etc). > > > >The overheating issue is most likely an e-machines issue, than an AM= D > > > >one, per se. That being said, one thing to note on the AMD line, is > > > >that there really isn't a true low power mobile processor, either. I= ts > > > >basically Athlon64, Turion(sp), or Semperon, none of which would > > > >compare to say Pentium M, on power usage as far as I'm aware. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that's not exactly true. (Well, the conclusion may not be wro= ng, > > > but the reasoning is <g>). > > > Turion64-CPUs consume about as much (or little) energy as Pentium-M > > chips. > > > But due to better overall design, the total power-consumption of > > > "Centrino"-laptops is some Watts less than that of Turion64-powered > > ones. > > > > > > http://www.amd.com/us- > > en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_12651_12658,00.html > > > > > > > > > > > > Rainer >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-mobile-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1cbd6f830507270341d715204>