Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Nov 2020 16:33:01 +0000
From:      "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <>
To:        cglogic <>
Cc:        "Matt Macy" <>,,,
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r368163 - in head: sbin/ifconfig sys/dev/if_wg sys/dev/if_wg/include sys/dev/if_wg/include/crypto sys/dev/if_wg/include/sys sys/dev/if_wg/include/zinc sys/dev/if_wg/module sys/dev/if_wg...
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References:  <> <> <> <> <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On 30 Nov 2020, at 14:53, cglogic wrote:

> So you propose to make it dependent on linuxkpi? What have to do a 
> user who does not compile linuxkpi, but wants to use if_wg?

If we’d move the implementations into linuxkpi you’d have to compile 
it to use if_wg.
So that this however is only a question.

Effectively you are using parts of linuxkpi now already, just 
copy&pasted (duplicated) into local files under if_wg;  for as much as I 
can see for most of that would however not require linuxkpi to be 
loaded, just present at compile time like any other kernel headers.


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>