Date: Mon, 08 Jan 1996 02:28:59 -0800 From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> To: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Cc: james@else.net, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Disposition of unknown PCI ethernet solved Message-ID: <199601081029.CAA01549@corbin.Root.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 08 Jan 96 20:18:51 %2B1030." <199601080948.UAA02007@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>David Greenman stands accused of saying: >> >If the PCI code (Stefan?) can't bend the ed driver around to talk to this >> >card, then obviously visuserconfig() should be updated 8) >> >> The 'ed' driver is an ISA device, not PCI. There is nothing special about >> 0x2000 - ISA devices can use port addresses anywhere in the 16bit 0x0-0xffff >> range. > >Hmm, then why did I pick it? 8) I was kinda hoping that you'd be able to tell me... :-) > I'm aware that 0x400 is the conventional >hardware limit for 'true' ISA, and my recollection is that there were a few >extra address line son EISA slots, but I'm obviously hazy on that one. Early ISA controllers only decode 10 bits worth. The convention for EISA is slot # * 0x1000. -DG David Greenman Core Team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601081029.CAA01549>