Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:30:34 -0800 From: "Chris H" <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> To: <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Message-ID: <34c67e5e59cd70457872c05ced69c776@ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <54B660BE.1020404@yahoo.com> References: <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net> <20150112130804.GD44537@home.opsec.eu> <CA%2BE3k92LJPRNA-pj_5EkheMogWitpCfgaUi==KsfAz=gZMu5jw@mail.gmail.com> <fe6efb4ec026964fb08d50ada48957a5@ultimatedns.net> <CA%2BE3k92wtj_584PvgjLmHXCyYPLX9%2B95SkC8fdfHK%2BZR0sdybg@mail.gmail.com> <9132c8812ccd3906dd487830a912d00c@ultimatedns.net> <alpine.BSF.2.11.1501121119020.82614@wonkity.com> <9f016d9eec43a047bcfbae526367a2c1@ultimatedns.net> <54B5389D.2020708@astart.com> <54B53DC8.6000701@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20150113155553.GJ44537@home.opsec.eu>, <54B660BE.1020404@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:27:42 -0800 Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> wrote > On 01/13/15 07:55, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > Hi! > > > >> customizations you need available. If the default options don't cut it > >> for you, in order to use only binary packages that means you need to run > >> your own poudriere setup -- which is well worth it if you're managing > >> several machines / jails etc. > > poudriere allows you to manage several seperate pkg trees with different > > options, so you can: > > > > - build a default tree (and pkg repo), provide it to all generic hosts > > - build a seperate tree (and pkg repo) with modified options, and > > provide it to the special hosts > > > > It helps to keep the poudriere build tree on fast flash/SSD drives 8-} > > > > This all works and is very, very good! Thanks for the work! > > > As I probably won't ever know enough from experience, if one wants a > local lan > build tool is there any flowchart with use cases > > 1... foo foo bar use case >> tinderbox > 2... foo foo bar use case >> build jail > 3... foo foo bar use case >> bhyve > 4... foo foo bar use case >> poudriere > 5... foo foo bar use case >> csbd OR qjail OR ezjail OR man jail OR > bastille script > 6... foo foo bar use case >> server on lan serving packages > > And where they may overlap, which takes the least setup time, which > takes the > least maintenance time, which can be most easily migrated version > > version ... Excellent observation. These look like prime "install candidates". A sort of meta-install, much like a Server, or Desktop install is already. Maybe someone with good install-foo could easily cobble up appropriate scripts to accommodate such a thing. Thanks for bringing it up, Jeffrey! --Chris > > > > Not to mention the wiki, but if that information was "[some term ] use > cases" like > virtualization or multi-machine or... on the freebsd.org page > prominently, it may > result in a larger userbase... more coders onboard. > > Recognizing that a lot of this is emerging technology. Apologies. I've > a slight > interest in reading any such document, having read an hour or so > yesterday not > a few htm explaining jails, (10 pages of threads linked from > a search 'ezjail' in the forums, for example) to know that acquiring the > expertise of > a quickstart group of terms to focus on in any particular scenario is > something I don't > easily expect to acquire. > > On the other hand, to include the wiki... vs links from it. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?34c67e5e59cd70457872c05ced69c776>