Date: Tue, 13 May 1997 23:57:36 -0700 From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is Thot (WYSIWIG editor) for you? Message-ID: <33796260.1A2C@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> References: <199705132254.PAA29845@rah.star-gate.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sure it must be tested in scope and stability, but that shouldn't stop us from porting it, or at least submitting patches to INRIA. If it is not what we (you) expect form it, we can do what Amaya does and use Thot's library to implement a "better" tool. Amaya is valuable for it's own reasons: I PR'd sometime ago that Arena signalled "Bad HTML" on at least one page of our documentation project. Having an standard tool (even if it's beta) is very important. Pedro. Amancio Hasty wrote: > > Before even on deciding on a separate CDrom distribution , it is more > appropriate to decide whether thot is useful or not. On the surface > it looks really good , I just have to use thot more extensively over > here to determine is goodness. > > Cheers, > Amancio >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?33796260.1A2C>