Date: Wed, 7 Jan 1998 18:05:32 -0500 (EST) From: Snob Art Genre <benedict@echonyc.com> To: Wilko Bulte <wilko@yedi.iaf.nl> Cc: FreeBSD hackers list <FreeBSD-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: weird natd setup, can use input on how-to Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980107170231.16843A-100000@echonyc.com> In-Reply-To: <199801071823.TAA00718@yedi.iaf.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 7 Jan 1998, Wilko Bulte wrote: > I'm as far as getting ping to work from the storage to the sparc20. Okay, so IP is being routed from the 16.198 (production) network to the 192.168.200 (lab) network, and back. > I can also get out from the sparc20 to everywhere on 16.xxx.xxx.xxx > (gatekeeper.dec.com won't let me go further ;-) ) Ok. > What does not want to work is telnet from storage to sparc20. Natd shows > the translations going on (with -v) but the connection times out. Can I see the output of natd? I haven't worked with it. Also, some tcpdump traces would be most helpful. If you run one tcpdump on 192.168.200.1 and another on 16.198.16.101 (the two interfaces of storgate), we can determine exactly what's getting routed and what isn't. > Another problem: since wilkux is not on the same subnet as storgate I have > to give it a default route to the router responsible for the 16.198.208 > network. Huh? Is 16.198 subnetted? You neglected to mention that. ;-) > Of course I want to set a route for 192.168.200.xxx to go thru > storgate. Question: can I get 192.168.200.xxx to be routed at all? It is > a RFC(I forgot) network which is supposed to be non-routed. Let's try and find out. Give the 16.198.208 router a (static) route to the 192.168.200 network. > When I ping to sparc20 from wilkux I end up getting an 'unreachable' from > gatekeeper.dec.com. There's no need for those packets to go all the way to the edge of your network and back. Gatekeeper should never see them. > Apparantly the router handling wilkux default route *does* try to route > the 192.168.200.xxx addresses. This also means the packets never arrive > at storgate. Sounds right to me. > What are the chances of ever getting this to work? I'm not a network expert > so I sure could use some help. Since it looks like storgate is routing those RFC 1918 addresses, there's no reason known to me why this setup shouldn't work. Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.96.980107170231.16843A-100000>