Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 11:18:09 +0200 From: Valentin Nechayev <netch@netch.kiev.ua> To: Dan Strick <strick@covad.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS file system problem in either stable or current Message-ID: <20031102091809.GA310@iv.nn.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <200310221014.h9MAEX3V001280@ice.nodomain> References: <200310221014.h9MAEX3V001280@ice.nodomain>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 03:14:33, strick (Dan Strick) wrote about "UFS file system problem in either stable or current": DS> There seems to be an inconsistency between release 4.9-RC and 5.1 ufs DS> support. If I fsck the same ufs (type 1 of course) file system on DS> both releases, each claims that the other has left incorrect DS> summary data in the superblock. Presumably only one can be correct. DS> I just don't know which to blame. Does this require explicit fsck? I have dual-booting between 4.9-release (and all previous 4.* releases earlier) and 5.1 (of 20030526) with shared disks and boot checking required in fstab; sometimes one of them crash and forced checking is made; neither 4.* nor 5.1 claims superblock is bad. -netch-
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031102091809.GA310>