Date: Wed, 14 May 97 11:11:01 +0200 From: garyj@frt.dec.com To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is Thot (WYSIWIG editor) for you? Message-ID: <9705140911.AA28872@cssmuc.frt.dec.com> In-Reply-To: Message from "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> of Tue, 13 May 97 13:01:44 PDT.
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co writes: > Amancio Hasty wrote: > > > > "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> pointed me out to: > > http://opera.inrialpes.fr/thot/ > > .... > > > > If thot should prove to be useful and stable we can adopt it . > > Hey, if the code bloat bothers you it is well worth it to have a > > separate CDROM with tot and amaya, a web editor / browser. > > We can also include other OO packages such as ACE, ILU and a couple of > > CORBA ORBs 8) > > > It's not that much, besides thot's libraries are shared by Amaya. WC may > also be happy, some people prefer Linux because "it comes with more CDs" > :-). > putting this in the tree is not such a good idea since most people don't have Motif. If this could be made to work with lessitf, then it would be a good candidate for a port. I played around with it a little bit yesterday with the goal of getting it to work with lesstif, but I can't even get it to compile. Too much stuff missing in config.h, I think. --- Gary Jennejohn (work) gjennejohn@frt.dec.com (home) Gary.Jennejohn@munich.netsurf.de (play) gj@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9705140911.AA28872>