Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:03:19 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> Subject: Re: please check your ports, pre-install vs pre-su-install Message-ID: <20060215170319.GA50425@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <43F354AD.8030403@FreeBSD.org> References: <20060214112901.A74586@xorpc.icir.org> <43F2884E.1070006@FreeBSD.org> <20060214230933.B81035@xorpc.icir.org> <43F354AD.8030403@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 08:19:57AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > Luigi Rizzo wrote: >=20 > > or that you consider the two targets redundant and just default > > to one (pre-install with additional credential switch) should be enough= ? >=20 > Yes. I think ports should handle this transparently, without the port aut= hor > having to do multiple target gymnastics. If you want this, you'll have to provide patches and a migration plan. Kris --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD817XWry0BWjoQKURArkrAJ9cRSywenum+v+LO+cQ4MMXeX8neACgtZ+j MMkUB3/F6xkHqWYz2IsXhTc= =gbaF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060215170319.GA50425>