Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 03:55:23 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Juha Saarinen <juha@saarinen.org> Cc: Pete French <pfrench@firstcallgroup.co.uk>, ertr1013@student.uu.se, chat@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: CFLAGS Optimization Message-ID: <20010508035522.A93006@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <KPECIILENDDLPCNIMLOFCENPCDAA.juha@saarinen.org>; from juha@saarinen.org on Tue, May 08, 2001 at 10:23:41PM %2B1200 References: <E14x41e-0003PI-00@dilbert.fcg.co.uk> <KPECIILENDDLPCNIMLOFCENPCDAA.juha@saarinen.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 10:23:41PM +1200, Juha Saarinen wrote: > :: I suspect people dont know the difference between gcc and pgcc=20 > :: (which ends up > :: being called 'gcc' on Linux I believe). pgcc does have optimisations up > :: to O6 - > ::=20 > :: http://www.goof.com/pcg/pgcc-faq.html#opts >=20 > No, -O9 is a valid optflag, from 2.95.2 from what I can tell. Please enlighten me what it does, then :-) Kris --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE699CaWry0BWjoQKURAgb+AJ4j1KiyyCdlw45vq5PmFrIcy9AOQACgxZUW ZFqvb2PA8z6P2vkpQ9cDHKs= =vA07 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010508035522.A93006>